Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alfred Fasy et al., Respondents, v. International Navigation Company, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 591 · caselaw · US
General
Alfred Fasy et al., Respondents, v. International Navigation Company, Appellant
177 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alfred Fasy et al., Respondents, v. International Navigation Company, Appellant.
Fasy v. International Navigation Oo., 77 App. Div. 469, affirmed.
(Argued February 11, 1904;
decided March 1, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 2, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Henry Galbraith Ward and Norma/n B. Beecher for appellant.
Joseph P. Osborne for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Yann and Cullen, JJ.