Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
JOHN F. BETZ & SON, Limited, Claimant of 27 Tanks of Beer, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1926 — 9 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
JOHN F. BETZ & SON, Limited, Claimant of 27 Tanks of Beer, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
9 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JOHN F. BETZ & SON, Limited, Claimant of 27 Tanks of Beer, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
February 11, 1926.)
No. 3409.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Dickinson, Judge.
William A. Gray and Walter Willard, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Francis B. Biddle, Asst. U. S. Atty., and George W. Coles, U. S. Atty., both of Philadelphia, Pa.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
There is not enough in
this case to distinguish it from Daeufer-Lieberman Brewing Co. v. United States (C. C. A.) 8 F.(2d) 1. As it is ruled by the law of the latter case, the decree of the District Court is reversed.