Contracts · MBE-tested
Former Employees of Levi Strauss, plaintiffs v. United States of America, defendant
26 Ct. Int'l Trade 969·United States Court of International Trade·2002
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Former Employees of Levi Strauss, plaintiffs v. United States of America, defendant
Court No. 00-11-00522
(Dated August 21, 2002)
[MAJORITY — Carman, Chief Judge:]
JUDGMENT ORDER
Carman, Chief Judge:
Upon consideration of the failure to prosecute this action with due diligence by Plaintiffs, appearing pro se, despite being provided notice by this Court of Plaintiffs’ need to timely file a US-CIT R. 56.1 Motion for Judgment on the Agency Record, it is hereby,
Ordered that this case is dismissed pursuant to USCIT R. 41(b)(3).