General
Claea Harmon, Respondent, v. Vanderbilt Hotel Company, Appellant
143 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Claea Harmon, Respondent, v. Vanderbilt Hotel Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 8, 1894;
decided October 23, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the se'cond judicial department, entered upon an order made June 18,1894, which overruled a demurrer to the complaint and reversed an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon an order of Special Term.
J. Newton Fiero for appellant.
N. D. Birdsall for respondent.
Agree to affirm order, with costs, with leave to defendant to answer- within twenty days upon payment of costs; no opinion.
[MAJORITY]
All concur.
Order affirmed.