Torts · MBE-tested
Charles Pluckham, Respondent, v. American Bridge Company, Appellant
186 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Pluckham, Respondent, v. American Bridge Company, Appellant.
Pluckham v. American Bridge Co. 104 App. Div. 404, affirmed.
(Argued October 15, 1906;
decided November 13, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 18, 1905, which reversed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and an order denying a motion for a new trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.
Frank Verner Johnson for appellant.
Charles Caldwell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
■ Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.