General
Clark et al. v. Doyle, Excise Administrator, et al.
317 U.S. 590·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 258.
Clark et al. v. Doyle, Excise Administrator, et al.
October 12, 1942.
Messrs. Lloyd D. Claycombe and Albert Stump for appellants. Mr. Urban C. Stover, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) Gorin v. United States, 312 U. S. 19, 27; (2) Eberle v. Michigan, 232 U. S. 700, 706.