Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pecheur Lozenge Co., Inc. v. National Candy Corp., 1941 — 314 U.S. 603 · caselaw · US
General
Pecheur Lozenge Co., Inc. v. National Candy Corp.
314 U.S. 603·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 648.
Pecheur Lozenge Co., Inc. v. National Candy Corp.
November 10, 1941.
Messrs. Joseph Fairbanks and Alfred J. L’Heureux for petitioner. Mr. James D. Carpenter, Jr. for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted. Counsel are requested to present their views as to whether state law governs and, if so, what the applicable state law is.