Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
T. H. Benton Crane, as Receiver, Appellant, v. Elizabeth N. Shuler et al., Respondents, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 656 · caselaw · US
General
T. H. Benton Crane, as Receiver, Appellant, v. Elizabeth N. Shuler et al., Respondents
153 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
T. H. Benton Crane, as Receiver, Appellant, v. Elizabeth N. Shuler et al., Respondents.
Crane v. Shuler, 91 Hun, 635, affirmed.
(Argued April 30, 1897;
decided May 14, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 18, 1895, which affirmed, a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint on trial at Special Term.
Z. 8. Westbrook for appellant.
Albert C. Tennant for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed on opinion below, with costs.
All concur.