Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alice McCarthy, Respondent, v. Emerson Featherston, Individually, and as Surviving Administrator of Myra White, Deceased, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 598 · caselaw · US
General
Alice McCarthy, Respondent, v. Emerson Featherston, Individually, and as Surviving Administrator of Myra White, Deceased, Appellant
162 N.Y. 598·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur ; Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting, Landon, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alice McCarthy, Respondent, v. Emerson Featherston, Individually, and as Surviving Administrator of Myra White, Deceased, Appellant.
McCarthy v. Featherston, 15 App. Div. 625, affirmed.
(Argued February 7, 1900;
decided February 27, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 5, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
A. W. Boynton for appellant.
S. E. Maders for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur ; Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting, Landon, J.