Contracts · MBE-tested
Hoffa v. United States; Parks v. United States; Campbell v. United States; and King v. United States
386 U.S. 940·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 32.
No. 33.
No. 34.
No. 35.
Hoffa v. United States; Parks v. United States; Campbell v. United States; and King v. United States.
Leonard B. Boudin for Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association, as amicus curiae, in support of motion to vacate judgment. Morris A. Shenker, Daniel B. Maher and Joseph A. Fanelli for petitioner in No. 32, Jacques M. Schifjer for petitioner in No. 33, Cecil D. Branstetter for petitioner in No. 34, and P. D. Maktos and Harold E. Brown for petitioner in No. 35 on the motion to vacate judgment. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in all four cases in opposition to the motion to vacate judgment.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. (Decided 385 U. S. 293; rehearing denied, post, p. 951.)
Motion of Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion to. vacate judgment deniéd. Mr. Justice White and Mr. . Justice Fortas took ho part in the consideration or decision of these motions.