Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Michael Tully, Respondent, v. New York and Texas Steamship Company, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 614 · caselaw · US
General
Michael Tully, Respondent, v. New York and Texas Steamship Company, Appellant
162 N.Y. 614·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Gray and Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Tully, Respondent, v. New York and Texas Steamship Company, Appellant.
Tully v. N. Y. & Texas Steamship Co., 10 App. Div. 463, affirmed.
(Argued February 2, 1900;
decided March 20, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 6, 1897, modifying and as modified affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial.
George S. Coleman, Tallmadge W. Foster and Thomas B. Hewitt for appellant.
Fdwin P. Leavitt for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment 'affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Gray and Bartlett, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.