Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fred R. SMITH et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL SURETY CO., Appellee, 1929 — 31 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
Tax
Fred R. SMITH et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL SURETY CO., Appellee
31 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fred R. SMITH et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL SURETY CO., Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
April 9, 1929.
No. 8507.
Roy E. Willy and M. G. Buddy, both of Sioux Falls, S. D., for appellants.
U. S. G. Cherry, Holton Davenport, and Gale B. Braithwaite, all of Sioux Falls, S. D., for appellee-
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, without taxation of costs in favor of either party, per stipulation of parties.