Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sam STOKENBERRY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee, 1928 — 31 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
Sam STOKENBERRY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
31 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sam STOKENBERRY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
November 19, 1928.
No. 8303.
H. T. Church and C. T. Byrd, both of Tulsa, Okl., for appellant.
John M. Goldesberry, U. S. Atty., and W. B. Blair and Harry Seaton, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Tulsa, Okl.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of appellant and consent of counsel for the United States.