Corporations
Royal Cadillac Service, Inc. et al. v. United States et al.
317 U.S. 595·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 423.
Royal Cadillac Service, Inc. et al. v. United States et al.
November 9, 1942.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed, it appearing that the only substantial question raised by the appeal — whether under § 206 (a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U. S. C., § 306 (a), appellants may lawfully continue operation until the determination by the Commission of their application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity — has become moot because of the denial of such application by the Interstate Commerce Commission on September 16, 1942.
Mr. George H. Rosen for appellants. Solicitor General Faky and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al; Mr. Henry P. Goldstein for the Mountain Transit Corporation; and Mr. James F. X. O’Brien for the Hudson Transit Lines, — appellees.