General
Dirks et al. v. Birkholz et al.
393 U.S. 820·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 172.
Dirks et al. v. Birkholz et al.
David Previant and David Leo Uelmen for Dirks, John J. Naughton for Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, and James P. Reedy for Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co., petitioners.
Ruth Wey- and for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted. Case set to follow No. 158 [mpra],