Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HENRY et al. v. WARNER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, et al., 1973 — 412 U.S. 1201 · caselaw · US
General
HENRY et al. v. WARNER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, et al.
412 U.S. 1201·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HENRY et al. v. WARNER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, et al.
No. A-1124.
Decided May 18, 1973
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Douglas, Circuit Justice.]
Mr. Justice Douglas, Circuit Justice.
The application for an order vacating the stay of the Court of Appeals is denied on the representation of the Solicitor General that the named applicants in the case have all been released from confinement and that within the Central District of California no persons are currently confined in any military detention facility as a result of a conviction by summary court-martial without the aid of counsel. Whether the District Court has authority to issue a writ of habeas corpus for unnamed members of the class outside the District and/or on a worldwide basis is so novel a question that an order granting such relief should be issued only after full argument. Application denied.