Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Rafferty, Respondent, v. Richard K. Anderson, Appellant, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 597 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Mary Rafferty, Respondent, v. Richard K. Anderson, Appellant
188 N.Y. 597·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Rafferty, Respondent, v. Richard K. Anderson, Appellant.
(Argued April 10, 1907;
decided April 30, 1907.)
Rafferty v. Anderson, 106 App. Div. 383, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 11, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from interfering with a certain fence erected by the plaintiff or trespassing upon the land inclosed thereby.
Thomas O' Connor for appellant.
Eugene D. Flanigan and Benjamin W. Knower for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T: Bartlett, Haight, Vann and Hiscock, JJ. Not sitting: Chase, J.