Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Disbarment of Wolff, 1976 — 424 U.S. 951 · caselaw · US
General
In re Disbarment of Wolff
424 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. D-54.
In re Disbarment of Wolff.
[MAJORITY]
It having been reported to the Court that Jerome B. Wolff, of Stevenson, Md., has been disbarred by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, and this Court by order of October 6, 1975 [423 U. S. 812], having suspended the said Jerome B. Wolff from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon respondent and that the time within which to file a response has expired;
It is ordered that the said Jerome B. Wolff be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.