General
Ernest E. Richards et al., partners, etc., et al. v. Mina M. Oakley
248 U.S. 541·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 634.
Ernest E. Richards et al., partners, etc., et al. v. Mina M. Oakley.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri.
Motion to dismiss submitted December 9, 1918.
Decided December 23, 1918.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257. (2) Goodrich v. Ferris, 244 U. S. 71, 81; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225, 232; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.
Mr. John G. Park for plaintiffs in error.. Mr. William S. Hogsett and Mr. Mont T. Prewitt for defendant in error.