General
AUGUST VIGNAUT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OP SACRAMENTO COUNTY et al., Respondents
48 Cal. App. 353·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1920·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 2204.
Third Appellate District.
June 29, 1920.]
AUGUST VIGNAUT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OP SACRAMENTO COUNTY et al., Respondents.
Certiorari—Vacation of Orders Sought to be Eeviewed—Dismissal op Petition.—On an application to the appellate court for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the superior court in " making certain orders in a civil action, where the certificate of the clerk of said superior court shows that the orders complained of have been vacated and, in consequence, the petitioner consents that the proceeding be dismissed, the proceeding will be dismissed.
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review certain orders of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and C. 0. Busick, Judge thereof. Petition dismissed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
R. Platnauer for Petitioner. '
No appearance for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.]
PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.
— The petitioner applies for a writ of review to review the action of above-named respondents in making certain orders in the civil action in said superior court pending wherein one Mary W. Yignaut is plaintiff and the petitioner herein is defendant.
It appears from the certificate of the clerk of said superior court on file herein that the orders complained of have been vacated and, in consequence, the petitioner consents that this proceeding he dismissed.
The proceeding is accordingly dismissed.
Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.