Corporations
Hearst Corporation, as Successor in Interest to Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Hertz Corporation, Appellant-Respondent; Hearst Corporation, as Successor in Interest to Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Hertz Corporation, Respondent-Appellant; Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Johanna Mykulak, Defendant
65 A.D.2d 725·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1978·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hearst Corporation, as Successor in Interest to Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Hertz Corporation, Appellant-Respondent. Hearst Corporation, as Successor in Interest to Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Hertz Corporation, Respondent-Appellant. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Johanna Mykulak, Defendant.
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 27, 1977, denying motion and cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We affirm the result reached although we do not necessarily accept the statement by the I. C. Part Justice of the issues of fact involved. Concur — Silverman, J. P., Fein, Markewich, and Sandler, JJ.