Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nancy K. McFEELY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1934 — 74 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Tax
Nancy K. McFEELY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
74 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1934
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nancy K. McFEELY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 5545.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 10, 1934.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1935.
Harry B. Wassell, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner.
Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Thomas A. Carpenter and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case depends on its own particular facts, and, as no precedent or principle is involved and we find ourselves in accord with the action of the Tax Board, we limit ourselves to affirmance of its order.