Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Jamieson et al., Respondents, v. The New York and Rockaway Beach Railway Company, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
General
John Jamieson et al., Respondents, v. The New York and Rockaway Beach Railway Company, Appellant
162 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Gray, J. Not sitting: Cullen, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Jamieson et al., Respondents, v. The New York and Rockaway Beach Railway Company, Appellant.
Jamieson v. N. T. & Rochaway Beach R. Co., 11 App. Div. 50, affirmed.
(Argued March 13, 1900;
decided April 3, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 6,1897, modifying and, as modified, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial.
William C. Beecher for appellant.
Henry A. Monfort for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Gray, J. Not sitting: Cullen, J.