General
Carl S. Reynolds, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Connecticut
203 U.S. 584·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 111.
Carl S. Reynolds, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Connecticut.
Argued for plaintiff in error and submitted for defendant in error November 16, 1906.
Decided November 19, 1906.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, decided October 22, and cases cited.
Mr. Clayton B. Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. A. Hull for defendant in error.