General
In the Matter of Lenny V., Appellant. Chautauqua County Attorney, Respondent
247 A.D.2d 919668 N.Y.S.2d 535·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1998·NY
Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Lenny V., Appellant. Chautauqua County Attorney, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[668 NYS2d 535]
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Based upon respondent’s history of antisocial behavior, truancy and inadequate parental supervision, Family Court properly exercised its discretion in determining that placement at a New York State Division for Youth facility was the “least restrictive available alternative” (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947; Matter of Quentin L., 231 AD2d 890; Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Violation of Probation.)
Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.