General
Swift & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL, Local 88, v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
352 U.S. 1015·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 624.
No. 677.
Swift & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL, Local 88, v. National Labor Relations Board et al.
Walter R. Mayne and Earl G. Spiker for Swift & Co., petitioner in No. 624 and respondent in No. 677. Joseph M. Jacobs, Mozart G. Ratner, Harry H. Craig and Thomas X. Dunn for the Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL, Local 88, petitioner in No. 677 and respondent in No. 624. Solicitor General Rankin, Stephen Leonard and Dominick L. Manoli for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Reported below. 99 U. S. App. D. C. 24, 237 F. 2d 20.