Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Fred BETTS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, 1931 — 57 F.2d 1071 · caselaw · US
General
Fred BETTS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America
57 F.2d 1071·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fred BETTS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 9357.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Nov. 28, 1931.
W. C. Irwin, of Jefferson City, Mo., for appellant.
William L. Vandeventer, U. S. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
' Motion for leave to doeket ease and file record out of time denied, and appeal docketed and dismissed on motion of appellee.