Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al. D. C. Idaho; and National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al., 1982 — 455 U.S. 901 · caselaw · US
General
National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al. D. C. Idaho; and National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al.
455 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
January 15, 1982
No. 81-1282.
No. 81-1283.
National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al. D. C. Idaho; and National Organization for Women, Inc., et al. v. Idaho et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. The parties are invited to file on or before Wednesday, January 20, 1982, responses to the suggestion of the Solicitor General that the Court vacate the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Idaho on grounds of lack of ripeness, without further briefing or oral argument.