Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Spencer Clinton et al., as Executors of Millicent D. Marshall, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Buffalo Land Security Company (Limited) et al., Appellants, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Spencer Clinton et al., as Executors of Millicent D. Marshall, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Buffalo Land Security Company (Limited) et al., Appellants
166 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Spencer Clinton et al., as Executors of Millicent D. Marshall, Deceased, Respondents, v. The Buffalo Land Security Company (Limited) et al., Appellants.
Clinton v. Buffalo Land Security Co., 55 App. Div. 440, affirmed.
(Argued March 18, 1901;
decided April 4, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 26, 1900, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plain tiffs entered upon a decision of the Erie County Court.
J. H. Metcalf for appellants.
Adolph Rebadow for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.