Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Davis et al. v. City of Homestead et al., 1940 — 311 U.S. 678 · caselaw · US
General
Davis et al. v. City of Homestead et al.
311 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 324.
Davis et al. v. City of Homestead et al.
October 14, 1940.
Mr. Charles A. Carroll for petitioners. Mr. Robert J. Pleus for the City of Homestead, and Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Melvin H: Siegel for the United States, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.