Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Helen G. CARPENTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1934 — 68 F.2d 995 · caselaw · US
Tax
Helen G. CARPENTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
68 F.2d 995·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Helen G. CARPENTER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 5166.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1934.
Thomas L. Marshall, of Chicago, 111., for petitioner.
Frank J. Wideman, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and FITZHENRY, Cireuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for respondent, counsel for petitioner consenting thereto, it is now here ordered and adjudged that this cause be doeketed in this court and that the petition for a review of the decision of the United State Board of Tax Appeals entered on January 16, 1933, be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.