Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United States, 1943 — 318 U.S. 748 · caselaw · US
Tax
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United States
318 U.S. 748·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 623, 624, and 625.
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United States.
February 15, 1943.
Messrs. W. A. Barnett, C. W. King, and A. L. Herr for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Littell, and Mr. Norman MacDonald for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.