MARLOW et al. v. MARSH et al.

MARLOW et al. v. MARSH et al. Where amendments are made to a statement on appeal, a fair copy of the statement so amended should be made. Otherwise, the Supreme Court will not look into it. Appeal from the District Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District, County of Hevada. ° » Francis J. Dunn for Appellants. McConnell & Niles, and A. A. Sargent, for Respondents. [MAJORITY — Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.] Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring. The papers, purporting to be a statement embodied in the transcript, consist of the draft prepared by the appellants, and the amendments proposed by the respondents, as they were originally served. The amendments agreed to by counsel should have been inserted in their proper place in the draft, and a fair copy of the whole made. In their separate form the draft and amendments do not constitute such a statement as we will look into on appeal. Judgment affirmed.