Contracts · MBE-tested
POTOMAC NEWS CO. v. UNITED STATES
389 U.S. 4719 L. Ed. 2d 46·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
The Chief Justice dissents. · Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
POTOMAC NEWS CO. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 164.
Decided October 23, 1967.
Stanley M. Dietz for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
[CONCURRENCE — Mr. Justice Harlan]
Mr. Justice Harlan
concurs in the judgment of reversal upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in. Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, 457.
The Chief Justice dissents.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.