Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., petitioners, v. NEW YORK, et al., 2019 — 139 S. Ct. 1249 · caselaw · US
General
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., petitioners, v. NEW YORK, et al.
139 S. Ct. 1249203 L. Ed. 2d 268·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., petitioners,
v.
NEW YORK, et al.
No. 18-966.
Supreme Court of the United States
Feb. 21, 2019.
Petitioner's brief on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support of petitioners or in support of neither party, are to be filed on or before Wednesday, March 6, 2019. Respondents' briefs on the merits, and any amicus curiae briefs in support of respondents, are to be filed on or before Monday, April 1, 2019. The reply brief on the merits is to be filed in accordance with Rule 25.3 of the Rules of this Court.