General
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
375 U.S. 12·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 177.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Howell Ellis, Homer 8. Carpenter and John C. Bradley for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Colin A. Smith and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.
Nuel D. Belnap, Harry C. Ames, Jr. and Leonard A. Jaskiewicz for motor carrier appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.