Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Deuterman et al., as Executors of Charles Deuterman, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alexander Pollock et al., Respondents, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 595 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Deuterman et al., as Executors of Charles Deuterman, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alexander Pollock et al., Respondents
172 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Deuterman et al., as Executors of Charles Deuterman, Deceased, Appellants, v. Alexander Pollock et al., Respondents.
Deuterman v. Gainsborg, 54 App. Div. 575, affirmed.
(Argued April 16, 1902;
decided October 7, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 26, 1901, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Eugene Frayer for appellants.
Wilson Brown, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.