General
The Peekskill, State Camp and Mohegan Railroad Company, Appellant, v. The Village of Peekskill, Respondent
165 N.Y. 628·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Peekskill, State Camp and Mohegan Railroad Company, Appellant, v. The Village of Peekskill, Respondent.
Peekskill R. R. Co. v. Vil. of Peekskill, 21 App. Div. 94, affirmed.
(Argued December 10, 1900;
decided January 8, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme. Court in the second judicial department, entered October 8, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.
C. Walter Artz and Frank Sullivan Smith for appellant.
Laverett F. Crumb, Franklin, Couch and David Wiley Travis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on authority of Curtis v. Van Bergh (161 N. Y. 47) and Ward v. Hudson River Building Co. (125 N. Y. 230).
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Bbien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.