Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Chas. Woo Quong
15 Cust. Ct. 372·United States Customs Court·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. Chas. Woo Quong
No. 6183.
Pro forma invoices dated November 27, 1942, etc.
Entered at Calexico, Calif., November 27, 1942, etc.
Entry No. 596-A, etc.
(Decided June 26, 1945)
Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General (Samuel D. Spector, special attorney), for the plaintiff.
Defendant not represented by counsel.
[MAJORITY — Oliver, Presiding Judge.]
Oliver, Presiding Judge.
The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon an oral stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties, agreeing, in- substance, that the proper value for the merchandise under consideration should be $32.75 per ton of 2,000 pounds, f. o. b. mill, net.
Accordingly, I hold the proper value for the involved merchandise to be $32.75 per ton of 2,000 pounds, f. o. b. mill, net.
Judgment will be rendered accordingly.