Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McGrew Paint & Asphalt Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; Railway Paint Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; Dednox, Inc. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; and Insul-Mastic Roofing & Siding Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor, 1945 — 323 U.S. 801 · caselaw · US
General
McGrew Paint & Asphalt Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; Railway Paint Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; Dednox, Inc. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; and Insul-Mastic Roofing & Siding Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor
323 U.S. 801·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 756. No. 757. No. 758. No. 759.
McGrew Paint & Asphalt Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; Railway Paint Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; Dednox, Inc. v. Murphy, Director of Labor; and Insul-Mastic Roofing & Siding Co. v. Murphy, Director of Labor.
January 29, 1945.
Messrs. Joseph G. Slottow and Charles Levitón for petitioners.
Messrs. George F. Barrett, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois denied.