Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Texas v. Louisiana, 1973 — 413 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
General
Texas v. Louisiana
413 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 36,
Orig.
Texas v. Louisiana.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of the State of Louisiana to enlarge the reference to the Special Master to fix the extension of Louisiana’s island boundary into the Gulf of Mexico between Louisiana, Texas, and the United States to the extent of Louisiana’s title under the Submerged Lands Act, or other alternative relief, is referred to the Special Master. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. In due course, after receipt of the brief of the United States, the Special Master shall submit his report to the Court on the motion. [See 410 U. S. 702.]