Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Taylor Instrument Companies v. Fawley-Brost Company, 1944 — 321 U.S. 785 · caselaw · US
General
Taylor Instrument Companies v. Fawley-Brost Company
321 U.S. 785·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 689.
Taylor Instrument Companies v. Fawley-Brost Company.
March 13, 1944.
Messrs. Edward S. Rogers, William T. Woodson, Karl D. Loos, and Preston B. Kavanagh for petitioner. Mr. Albert I. Kegan and Mrs. Esther 0. Kegan for respondent. Messrs. Will Freeman and C. B. Spangenberg on behalf of the Brown Instrument Co., and Messrs. Casper W. Ooms and E. S. Booth on behalf of the Republic Flow Meters Co., filed briefs, as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.