Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Barrett v. Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury, et al., 1940 — 309 U.S. 672 · caselaw · US
General
Barrett v. Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.
309 U.S. 672·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 701.
Barrett v. Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.
March 11, 1940.
Messrs. William Cattron Rigby, Éugh C. Smith, and Eugene R. West for petitioner.
Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Richard H. Demuth for respondents.
By leave of Court, Mr. Wüliant H. Mc-Grann filed a bribf on behalf of the Retired Officers of the U. S. Ñavy et al., as amici curiae, in support of the-petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the District of -Columbia
denied.