Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Coalgate Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. W. Hurst, as Administrator or Trustee, etc., 1912 — 225 U.S. 697 · caselaw · US
General
The Coalgate Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. W. Hurst, as Administrator or Trustee, etc.
225 U.S. 697·Supreme Court of the United States·1912
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 294.
The Coalgate Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. W. Hurst, as Administrator or Trustee, etc.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Motion to dismiss submitted April 29, 1912.
Decided May 13, 1912.
Mr. Arthur G. Moseley for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James R. Wood for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Wabash Railroad Company v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29, 38; United States v. Pridgeon, 153 U. S. 48, 53, 54; Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter, 177 U. S. 505, 508; Re Moran, 203 U. S. 96, 104.