Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
THE COMET NO. 5. COMET LIGHTERAGE COMPANY v. THE Steam Tug WILLIAM F. MESECK, Meseck Towing & Transportation Company, Claimant-Appellant, and the Steam Tug NEW YORK CENTRAL NO. 27, the New York Central Railroad Company, Claimant-Impleaded-Appellee, 1930 — 42 F.2d 656 · caselaw · US
General
THE COMET NO. 5. COMET LIGHTERAGE COMPANY v. THE Steam Tug WILLIAM F. MESECK, Meseck Towing & Transportation Company, Claimant-Appellant, and the Steam Tug NEW YORK CENTRAL NO. 27, the New York Central Railroad Company, Claimant-Impleaded-Appellee
42 F.2d 656·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE COMET NO. 5. COMET LIGHTERAGE COMPANY v. THE Steam Tug WILLIAM F. MESECK, Meseck Towing & Transportation Company, Claimant-Appellant, and the Steam Tug NEW YORK CENTRAL NO. 27, the New York Central Railroad Company, Claimant-Impleaded-Appellee.
No. 353.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 19, 1930.
Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for Meseck Towing & Transportation Co., claimant.
Alexander, Ash & Jones, of New York City (Edward Asb and Max Taylor, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant-appellee.
Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (Charles W. Hagen, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.