Torts · MBE-tested

Best Window Company, Respondent, v. Better Business Bureau of New York City, Inc., et al., Appellants

1 A.D.2d 1002·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1956·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Best Window Company, Respondent, v. Better Business Bureau of New York City, Inc., et al., Appellants. [MAJORITY] Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion granted. The second cause of action fails to state the essential facts to constitute a cause of action for malicious interference with business relations. The complaint is deficient both in respect to the alleged rights and wrongful interference. The business relations are alluded to but not sufficiently specified and the means or manner of the alleged tortious interferences are not stated. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Cox and Frank, JJ.