Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Steve CHABOT, et al., applicants, v. OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al., 2019 — 139 S. Ct. 2635 · caselaw · US
General
Steve CHABOT, et al., applicants, v. OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.
139 S. Ct. 2635204 L. Ed. 2d 280·Supreme Court of the United States·2019
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Steve CHABOT, et al., applicants,
v.
OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et al.
No. 18A1166.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 24, 2019.
Application for stay presented to Justice SOTOMAYOR and by her referred to the Court is granted, and it is ordered that the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, case No. 1:18-CV-00357, entered May 3, 2019, is stayed pending the timely filing and disposition of an appeal in this Court or further order of this Court.