Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Evan SELNESS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1933 — 67 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
General
Evan SELNESS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
67 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Evan SELNESS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 7167.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 22, 1933.
Harry G. McCain, of Ketchikan, Alaska, for appellant.
Wm. A. Holzheimer, U. S. Atty., and Geo. W. Folta, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Juneau, Alaska, and H. H. MePike, U. S. Atty., and Robert L. McWilliams, Asst. U. S. Atjty., both of San Francisco, Cal.
Before WILBUR and GARRBCHT, Circuit Judges and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
-Upon motion of counsel for appellee for affirmance of the order of the District Court upon the authority of In re Harding, 120 U. S. 782, 7 S. Ct. 780, 30 L. Ed. 824, and Braun v. U. S. A., 16 F.(2d) 118, and Wagner et al. v. U. S. A., 67 F.(2d) 656, decided by this court on November 21, 1923, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered: Judgment of District Court affirmed; that a decree of affirmance be filed and entered accordingly.