Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Pacific Mail Steamship Company, 1910 — 218 U.S. 692 · caselaw · US
General
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Pacific Mail Steamship Company
218 U.S. 692·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 294, 295, 296, 297 and 298.
The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Pacific Mail Steamship Company.
In error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
November 28, 1910.
The Attorney General for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Maxwell Evarts for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Attorney General Wickersham for the plaintiff in error.