Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jacob Mannasovitch, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 592 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jacob Mannasovitch, Appellant
186 N.Y. 592·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jacob Mannasovitch, Appellant.
'People v. Mannasovitch, 115 App. Div. 892, affirmed.
(Argued November 19, 1906;
decided December 4, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered October 19, 1906, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of attempt at rape in the second degree.
Charles Goldzier for appellant.
William Travers Jerome, District Attorney (E. Crosby Kindleberger of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.